The two bodies had met with labour officials on Friday last but steadfastly maintained their previous positions. NAACIE had initially demanded a 25 per cent increase while the GPL insisted that it could not even afford to pay the five per cent it had offered.
On Wednesday last, the unionised workers downed tools in protest at the proposal by GPL, calling it a meagre 1 per cent, and the union subsequently called for at least an eight per cent increase to be paid.
NAACIE had been arguing that the offer by the GPL flies in the face of a 2001 Collective Bargaining Agreement over wages and salaries, but the power company’s management insisted that the agreement had expired several years ago.
Chief Executive Officer of GPL, Bharrat Dindyal, this past week met with members of the media and suggested that the time had come for a new agreement to be negotiated.
Dindyal in reference to NAACIE, told media operatives that the union continuously refers to the 2001 agreement but this had expired in 2003.
He said that its expiration was with the proviso that wages negotiations would continue from 2004.
The power company’s CEO told media operatives that while GPL would have respected many elements of the agreement in the years subsequent to its expiration, the union had signed onto several all-inclusive offers made by GPL that are no different from the offer now.