MOST Guyanese are now wondering if the Guyana Human Rights Association (GHRA) is now another mouthpiece for opposition, since they already know that the GHRA represents only criminals while it has always remained silent on innocent victims of crimes. GHRA warns that snap elections risk ethnic appeal? Maybe GHRA should be made to answer to the Guyanese nation what they really mean by this statement.
Those in authority must seek the help of the UN and the International Community to investigate those at GHRA about the meaning of this statement.
Is GHRA really saying that if snap elections were called and the PPP/C won a majority because of the ethnic majority Indian make up in Guyana is a risk? Risk to what? GHRA should be made to explain.
Will government take this to the international community and the UN for clarification on GHRA’s statement?
According to GHRA, the fact that a ruling party was unable to “rubber stamp” its budget through the parliament for the first time since 1968, is in itself a welcome sign of democratic evolution.
Fact: What the GHRA will never say to Guyanese and the world is that the “rubber stamping” of the PNC’s reign of terror for 24 years came through rigged elections and hence were illegal.
Will GHRA have the guts to say to all Guyanese that elections from 1992 were all free, fair and transparent?
GHRA also blasted A Partnership For National Unity (APNU) for meeting with government at the Office of the President to discuss a budget deal.
GHRA must tell the Guyanese people the truth about how the AFC wanted to cut more of the budget, but many of those cuts would have placed most PNC supporters out of jobs and on the breadline.
PNC leader David Granger will have none of that and will never tolerate AFC wanting to put his supporters out of a job, so he had no other choice but to make that deal with the PPP/C.
Statements such as this must be taken very seriously. The GHRA must desist from politics in Guyana period; stop representing criminals and be the voice for innocent victims of crimes.