THE article in the August 6, 2010 Freddie Kissoon column accuses the Jagdeo Government of neglecting the interest of the people in their “politics of pragmatism”, describing the government as being driven by a quest for power instead of being centred on the ideals of morality, hope and change. To say that the Jagdeo government is blinded by its quest for power, and neglects the interest of the masses because it exercises “politics of pragmatism”, is incorrect. President Jagdeo, in his understanding of the needs of Guyana, has made constitutional changes that allow for democratic growth through healthy, constructive competition. Freedom of speech, association and communication ensure that the interest of all Guyanese are articulated and embraced as constitutional rights. A ‘power-driven dictator’ would in no way tolerate any form of opposition that poses a threat to power! Instead, the President, in his practical approach, acknowledges that although we are historically an ethnically diverse people, the interest of all Guyanese must be respected and embraced. And also, some Guyanese may feel that their interests are better articulated by different politicians.
Having a pragmatic approach to policymaking should never be criticised, as any rational government, after weighing the advantages and implications of policy, would naturally select the option that most benefits the country. Should this option become improbable, or even impossible, the next best alternative will be implemented. We cannot be led to think that the government is disregarding politics of morality, hope and change in their policy formulation. The government honours its moral obligation to protect and promote the interests of all Guyanese through pragmatic politics that generates tangible manifestations of hope and change in Guyana.