ASHANTI Schultz called “Blondie” who was recently freed of murder which it was proved that she did not commit, has sued the Attorney General (representing the State) for $200M damages for malicious prosecution.

“Blondie” who at her trial, Judge William Ramlal directed the jury to return a not guilty verdict in her favour after he had found her not

,guilty on a no-case submission by Defence Counsel, Nigel Hughes, had also been claiming in her writ exemplary damages.

She was claiming too, damages in excess of $50, 000.00 for malicious prosecution and false imprisonment of the plaintiff from 6th September, 2007 until July 2, 2009,

She is also claiming interest; Costs; and such further Order as the Honourable Court may seem just.

This writ was taken out by Attorney-at-law Mr. Nigel Hughes of the law firm of Hughes, Fields & Stoby.

“Blondie” said to have borne a child for the ‘famous’ Roger Khan was indicted for the unlawful killing of Kenrick Nero outside of Palm Court building, Main Street, Georgetown, on September 16, 2007.

At the jury trial, her counsel had argued successfully that the Police had at the Preliminary Inquiry, shelved evidence that related to the alleged killer and ducked evidence which showed that 4 witnesses had pointed to another women as the person who shot Nero that night