Dear Editor,
I  saw a letter by “Justice” Charles Ramson in which he, without his big worded diatribe, basically is attacking Napoleon Bonaparte and using that great figure in history to denigrate the Granger administration and predict a victory for the PPP which has his son on their list of electors. Ramson(Sr.) is  quite ignorant when it comes to Napoleon who is one of my heroes in history-he was a product of the French Revolution, the greatest upheaval in history, setting the stage for democratic reforms in Europe; Napolean was a military genius who won most of his battles by using military innovations of maneuver, speed and tactics unmatched  at that time(1798 to 1815); his administrative skills and visionary progressive approach led the Napoleonic Codes in Law which still influences the laws of many democracies around the world.

He changed history by the Lousiana Purchase where the USA bought all that land which Napolean approved. Every year at least a new book on Napolean is published on his life and they are mostly positive narratives on the life of this great figure in history. Ramson Sr. is obviously ignorant about Napoleon just as his son is ignorant in attacking the  Exxon-Mobil deal and I guess the saying , “like father, like son” is applicable here ,unless for both Ramsons, ignorance is bliss. Both will find out on March 2 when Mr. Granger and Mr.

Ramjattan win these elections and if I’m wrong , I’ll bury my head in the sand and you all will never hear from me again on politics-but I would like the same from the Ramsons, when the PPP loses, which, in my mind, is a certainty.

Yours faithfully,
Cheddi (Joey)Jagan(Jr.)