Brutal murder of guard shows need to rework Security Services Act

Dear Editor,

I HAVE a question: how can people be so cruel that they would slash a poor man’s throat as he works to make a few dollars to meet his basic daily needs?
According to articles in the Kaieteur News, Munesh Prem Ayasammy Monien, who worked as a security guard at Sukhram General Store and Agro Chemicals at Rose Hall, Corentyne, Berbice, was murdered while on duty.
Since his body was discovered with a gaping head wound, slashed throat and seemingly broken legs, it is clear that he was attacked with animalistic brutality and suffered a horrible death.

Reports stated that over $1M was stolen from the store and 11 persons, including some employees, are in custody and one person had confessed up to press time. This is blood money and it is a curse to those handling it, knowing how it was obtained.
What sort of sub-human creatures would pounce on this man, losing sleep for a few dollars, and murder him savagely just for their personal enrichment?
It always pains my heart when security guards (and others) are murdered, especially when they are brutally murdered on the job. It hurts more when their families get little or no compensation.
This brings me to an important point: Guyana’s Private Security Services Act needs to be reworked to give more protection to security personnel and provide compensation for workplace injuries or deaths, even for private watchmen.

This Act, passed in 2009, was made possible by the founder members of the Guyana Association of Private Security Organisations (GAPSO). It specifies provisions for security guards and outlines the essential requirements for security companies.
For instance, any person or persons wishing to operate a private security business must get a licence to do so and pay an annual fee for that licence. Under the Act, “private security” means security provided by a company to protect or guard a person or property.
Further, the Act describes a private security agency as a person(s) engaged in the business of providing security services of private security guards to any industrial or business undertaking, company or society, or any other person or property.

But many watchmen get no protection on the job and do not even get National Insurance Scheme (NIS) coverage. I would not be surprised if the murdered guard’s employers did not pay NIS contributions for him, which would have entitled his dependants to some type of NIS relief.
I strongly believe that GAPSO needs to put pressure on the government and the commissioner of police to rework Guyana’s Private Security Services Act to make it compulsory for employers of watchmen to provide them with protection. It should also specify the minimum level of protection.
Even though I was a founder member of GAPSO and served as its president, secretary and treasurer, for a variety of reasons I am not an active member now. I would be willing to disclose these reasons if any media practitioner wishes to interview me.

Nevertheless, I think it is appropriate to put pressure on the government and the commissioner of police, who is the administrator of private security services under the Act, to make it mandatory for financial and other provisions to be made to protect watchmen and guards and secure their interests.
The Act should embody full NIS coverage for watchmen and guards. This is high-risk employment; therefore, the Act should make it mandatory for their employers to set aside at least $1M to $2M to cater for emergencies.
These funds are critical to assist security personnel in the event of injury on the job, or to give to their families if they die in the course of duty. If this is too much for those engaging the services of watchmen and guards, then they ought to engage a private security service that makes such provisions. In addition, these workers should get special coverage from the NIS, which should be first in line to give compensation to them in the event of injury on the job, or to recompense their dependants if they die in the course of duty.
I founded RK’s Guyana Security Services and administered it for 39 years. I took out insurance for our security personnel; the first company to do so, setting the pace for others to follow. I am always happy to do this for security personnel because without them, how would businesses such as mine survive?
Even though all operators of such businesses are aware of this, not all of them pay their workers’ NIS contributions. Amazingly, such businesses are still able to get the necessary NIS compliance certificates, so that they can bid for government contracts (corruption!).
Security personnel are hardworking citizens. They are responsible for our survival and successes and we have to respect them and protect them.
The revised Act should specify that people who employ their own security staff are providing a private internal security service. Therefore, they have to get a licence that must be renewed annually at a cost. To do so without a licence is illegal, especially if the security staff are deprived of NIS coverage.
I am calling on the commissioner of police to guide the Ministry of Public Security and government, so that they can tweak the Act appropriately to reflect this.
Furthermore, some aspects of the current Act are not wholesome, because it was drafted by someone from India who I believe based it on Indian culture and sub-continent systems that do not work in Guyana.

It hurts my heart and tears my mind apart that watchmen have no protection when they work with private organisations and some legal security services are known to be stealing the NIS contributions and tax contributions and claim they have special protection and that even the Department of Labour and NIS cannot do them anything. This is indeed a sad thing and I am prepared to do something about it.
I am experienced in the local security industry where I have been operating since 1979. I am willing to talk to the relevant authorities and media in relation to this and give some free ideas based on my experience. My advice might save the life of at least one guard or watchman. Will anyone take up my offer?
RK’s Guyana Security Services extends condolences to the family of the watchman.

Regards
Roshan Khan Snr
CEO/Chairman-Founder
RK’s Guyana Security Services

SHARE THIS ARTICLE :
Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
All our printed editions are available online
emblem3
Subscribe to the Guyana Chronicle.
Sign up to receive news and updates.
We respect your privacy.