MUCH of the morbidity in domestic abuse or in man/woman relationships that continues to haunt us is not the sole cause of the man.

A lot of what happens is the root responsibility of the woman herself. Let us lay it where the chips fall. Many women are complicit or are accessories to these abusive episodes.
You cannot convince me that the common- law wife of that 63-year-old man was not knowledgeable of his horrendous past where the treatment of women is concerned? You cannot convince me that she was not aware of his abusive, murderous ways, past and present?
She knew fully-well what this man was capable of, and I dare say what were the goings-on in her own house with her daughter. But as the common practice is you keep it a “Hush hush inside story” until everything explodes out of proportion.
Well, sort of, because some women still defend the criminal even to the very end. This is the way these sick mothers, girlfriends and wives behave. However, amidst all the denials of the women in their lives, I do look forward to this sadistic psychopath of a man getting life imprisonment. He deserves to die a miserable death there.
In a related story, the same could be said of the niece of Neisha Naranjan who harboured and encouraged Rawle Samuels in an abusive relationship. There is no question in my mind that her niece was in an incestuous relationship with her spouse. She appears to be the innocent victim now, seeing the matter is in the open and her little nephew is dead, killed by the same man she was “Playing around with.”
She is as guilty as sin in this whole sordid affair. The question is, seeing Samuels was the common-law husband of her aunt and he is “so violent” an abuser, what was she doing at home alone with him?
These are searching questions that the so-called victims cannot give  straightforward answers to. The point I am making is when these women willingly allow a man to get, for lack of a better word “free access” to their bodies, then everything else falls into place.
He believes he can now do practically anything in that house even to the point of killing innocent little Jamal Naranjan if he comes in the way.
The man is emboldened to do the unthinkable, so kill the  “lil anti-man”  because he talks too much – not disrespecting the dignity of the dead little boy, but I want the editor to publish the preceding sentence because it clearly brings home the point.
What threat can a five year old pose to a grown man for him to stab him so many times resulting in his death? It answers the question as to how much a bully he was pampered into becoming.
When someone as we say in Guyanese creole “Run through that house” like that then put nothing past the actions of a violent abuser. In his mind he can do as he pleases; he owns the people and the place.
The common thread here is a lack of respect for people, lack of respect for life. The abuser then exhibits a total disregard for people; there are no boundaries here for him because sadly, the women allowed it. But as I said earlier, such persons should be removed from society, permanently.