Hughes attempts to justify his actions

–PEEPER’s queries laughable
NIGEL Hughes’s response to allegations of criminal conduct in several instances is laughable, because all these things are out in the public domain.This man, Nigel Hughes, is trying to exonerate himself from allegations of jury tampering by claiming his jury foreman associate is a PPP member because the foreman participated in a public picketing exercise against Nigel Hughes.
Everyone knows that many current AFC members were once PPP members, so, even if this is true, then it still does not excuse him from non-disclosure of the fact that he was associated with the jury foreman prior to the trial of the Lusignan murder suspect, who he represented, free of charge.
Nigel will never say how this was set up; not even old Grandma Sandy will swallow this. Nigel Hughes should have been prosecuted and disbarred from the time he tampered with evidence at a murder scene at the Buxton Gas Station.
Nigel Hughes said, “The same foreman, as part of his party duties in 2012, participated in a public picketing exercise against me at the Supreme Court during the hearings of the Linden Commission of Inquiry. He was there along with senior members of the PPP. A copy of the photograph of the foreman on the PPP picket line is attached for your benefit.”
How did Hughes come to the conclusion that this was part of the man’s Party duties and not done through his own convictions? And who were the other picketers? Is this part of a PPP or an AFC picket line? And how does this acquit him from the charge of non-disclosure?
Nigel Hughes and his buddies are not smart in setting up things this way. His wife, Cathy, has a television studio where photographs are easily doctored, and it is an easy matter to insert the man’s likeness through photoshop.
Nigel Hughes could now tell the Guyanese masses who else were there in that picketing exercise.The PPP should find the guts and belly to bring Hughes to trial.
PEEPING TOM has asked KN, “Where are the SLEEPING MEDIA?” However, the very media in which the PEEPER writes his column is a big sleeper, and notoriously anti-PPP Government, so the PEEPER should ask his boss why his newspaper is sleeping on things the PEEPER wants to know; issues such as the ‘baton boy’ allegation, and the 19 polling stations that were not counted last elections, which would have favoured the PPP.
The PEEPER said the media are not doing their job thoroughly. The media were quick on the gun in reporting allegations that a young man was sodomized while in police custody, and as a consequence of this assault he had suffered ruptured intestines. The PEEPER failed to mention the name/s of those sleeping media.
That allegation of sodomy was only raised two months after the act of sodomy causing perforation of his intestines (which would have killed him) was said to have been committed, and after the young man would have had the opportunity to inform the Courts what had happened to him.
The PEEPER does not understand how those who cannot win elections at the polls to govern are brewing a race war. The very SLEEPING media the PEEPER is talking about were quick to name a police officer of a certain race, stating that he shoved the big, large police baton up the felon’s anus.The local doctors proved this was not the case. Even a former judge in an inquiry said the baton is too big and way too large to fit in the man’s anus; that ‘The Baton Boy’ would not have been able to walk at present had he been sodomised with that size of baton.
The PEEPER said the boy’s handlers sent him to Jamaica for a medical test, which was done and proved that a foreign object was indeed inserted up the boy’s anus, but could not prove when it happened. The PEEPER should have concluded by now that what the inquiry judge said about the size of the police baton: If the POLICE BATON can’t fit, then you must acquit.
The PEEPER said the media have equally not sought their own independent medical advice to determine whether it is possible, so long after an alleged sodomy took place, for evidence to still be present confirming that act.
Again, the PEEPER must be reminded that it is not in the opposition media’s best interests to print or telecast anything that will favour the PPP Government and the Guyana Police Force. Once the opposition says to the sleeping media that this is so, and that is so, and these are the facts, the anti- PPP media run with it to carry out the opposition’s agenda of trying to create a race war.
The PEEPER asked: “Has[sic] the media already made up its mind as to what took place, and are not interested in examining all sides to this issue?” Again, the PEEPER must be reminded that it is not in the anti-PPP media’s best interests to make the PPP Government and police look good if the media are the conduits in facilitating an opposition-driven race war.
The PEEPER will come to understand that, again, it is not in the anti-PPP media’s best interests to inquire who voted for PPP and in which PPP stronghold votes from 19 ballot boxes were not counted on polling day in 2011. You bet your life the same sleeping media would have awakened, and you would have heard the loud growling, had it been one single PNC polling station not being counted, let alone 19.
The PEEPER asked: “Could it be that these votes that were not counted would have annulled the one-seat majority of the combined opposition? And is this the reason why the media are not highlighting this issue?”
The former President of Guyana and other PPP people said they withdrew their request for a recount and checks of all polling stations all across Guyana because the PNC was threatening violence if they had lost the election.
The PEEPER should ask what is there to stop the PNC from threatening violence again come next elections.
Written By T. KING

SHARE THIS ARTICLE :
Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
All our printed editions are available online
emblem3
Subscribe to the Guyana Chronicle.
Sign up to receive news and updates.
We respect your privacy.