Foreign minister briefs South Rupununi residents on border controversy
The foreign minister discusses game strategy with a local football coach
The foreign minister discusses game strategy with a local football coach

VICE-PRESIDENT and Minister of Foreign Affairs, Carl Greenidge, has urged South Rupununi residents to be fully informed about the Guyana-Venezuela border issue, as the existing controversy lays claim to their land.

He made the call during a recent visit to the region where he noted that should Venezuela’s claim be successful at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), a majority of indigenous lands and all of Guyana’s maritime space would be handed over to the country.
This is one of the main reasons he stressed that all Guyanese should make an effort to be thoroughly informed on the issue and the related implications.

“Venezuela is seeking ownership of these places and the resources in them,” highlights a brochure issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. “This means that the laws governing land titles and decisions about their allocation and ownership will be made in Venezuela.”
Additionally, according to a release from the ministry, Greenidge said that this is why the government has continuously fought to ensure that Guyana’s sovereignty over all its lands remains intact and that the issue is placed before the ICJ.
“We are confident of the success of that effort,” he said.

Until 2018, despite strenuous efforts, previous governments had not been able to get the matter to the ICJ.

The controversy between Venezuela and Great Britain over the Guyana-Venezuela border began around the second half of the 19th century.

It continued until an international arbitration tribunal issued an award on October 3, 1899 — a decision that was honoured by Venezuela for over half a century.
But that state renewed its claim over Guyana’s territory during the Cold War.
It referred to a memorandum prepared by one of Venezuela’s lawyers on the tribunal, Mr. Severo Mallet-Prevost, which claimed that the award was the result of a political deal between Great Britain and Russia.

Minister of Foreign Affairs Carl Greenidge (right) and Minister of Public Infrastructure, David Patterson, field questions during a meeting in Karaudanau

This was never proved and Mallet-Prevost’s claim was rejected from the inception.
Since 1966, and for about three decades, Guyana and Venezuela were engaged in a number of steps; these included a Good Offices Process, under the auspices of the United Nations Secretary-General, which was designed to find a solution to the controversy. However, those were unsuccessful.

In keeping with the recommendations of the United Nations Secretary-General, who had been called upon under the provisions of the Geneva Agreement to choose a means from a list of options, an approach was made to the ICJ. On 29 March, 2018, Guyana filed its application with the court requesting that body to consider and confirm the legal validity of the arbitral award. The ICJ considered the application and invited Guyana to submit its memorial by November 20, 2018, while Venezuela has until April 19 this year to respond.
During his visit, Minister Greenidge also engaged with residents of Karaudanau and Sand Creek on other matters of national importance.

These included the no-confidence vote and its implications for governance; the national development policy; the prospects of the petroleum sector and its impact on the infrastructure and development of human and material resources across the country.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE :
Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
All our printed editions are available online
emblem3
Subscribe to the Guyana Chronicle.
Sign up to receive news and updates.
We respect your privacy.