Dear Editor,

REFERENCE is hereby made to the above caption as it relates to a female individual who, in the company of three persons, consisting of two males and another female, went to 72 Brummel Place, Stabroek on 09/05/16. The reason for their visit was to contact me to deliver a parcel sent from overseas by one of my brothers.How foolish of the female to convey such a message to the resident. Since the previous day, I was in contact with one of my brothers by telephone, and prior to that it was via email to two of them. So, in actuality, if a parcel was being sent, my name and contact number would have been affixed. But in the haste to have the petition delivered for a divorce, the young lady whose residence they went at was lied to. Nevertheless, out of generosity, she called my mobile and gave the individual her phone to speak. Lest I forget to mention, this is the hallmark of a so-called Christian who worships at a popular Christian Ministry.

By the way, are Christian values being preached/taught there, where a church member is going down the road of wickedness, lies and deceit? However, the individual didn’t cater for the camera affixed to the Central Baptist Church in the south-eastern corner, or the recording of the telephone conversation by GT&T.

Was the Court Marshal an occupant of the vehicle wherein was the impersonation of a Suppligen personnel in pursuit of conducting an interview and video shoot? My, oh my! In dragging the name of Beepat’s, the local distributing agent, into the gutter, it surely leaves much to be desired.

By a copy of this letter, the management of Beepat’s will be duly informed, in pursuit of any legal action they may wish to take against the petitioner. Editor, little does she know, or maybe she can’t recall, my previous association with football administration, which spanned a period of 28 years (1982-2010).

Between the years of 2008-2010, I was the Asst. Secretary/Treasurer of the GFA, and tournaments sponsored by Beepat’s under the brands of Milo and Suppligen at the junior level were part of the Association’s Annual Calendar of Activities.

Further, on a few occasions, I had appeared on the Suppligen Sports Desk programme with host Mark Younge. So, in essence I can’t be fooled that easily with the product of Suppligen.

Finally, even before the petitioner’s attorney-at-law had dreamt of pursuing studies in the legal field, within football administration, I was exposed to, and interacted with, whom many would consider a legal luminary, none other than Justice Loris Ganpatsingh, a former Chairman of the then Guyana Football Association’s Disciplinary Committee. Additionally, one of my late brothers, formerly a Canadian citizen, had purchased for me “Roberts Rules of Law”, which have been adapted by FIFA, IOC and the Commonwealth Parliamentary Associations, with Guyana being a signatory. As a consequence, I am well aware of the role and function of a Court Marshal, contrary to what was posted on Facebook by an attorney who, nevertheless, in the realm of unprofessionalism, quoted Stabroek News’ publication without perusing the daily Chronicle for my letter. This was maybe done due to political affiliation. How sad!

Also, I am aware how reports are presented, and it’s sadder for a petition to have erroneous and misleading information. Justice Loris Ganpatsingh would have surely highlighted all the inconsistencies, including typographical errors, and resend the document (petition). Is this applicable now? “The day when passion is accepted as a mark of womanhood, it will make the beginning of the end of feminity” Sai Baba.
Respectfully yours,
NAME WITHHELD