ATTORNEY-at-Law Darren Wade, on behalf of three of the country’s major trade unions, on Thursday withdrew the legal challenge of the COVID-19 emergency measures.

The decision comes in the wake of President Dr. Irfaan Ali’s amendment of an Executive Order that was previously made by his predecessor, President David Granger.

When the case came up for oral arguments before Acting Chief Justice Roxane George, SC, at the Georgetown High Court, Wade made an application for the matter to be withdrawn, claiming that the State has since “fixed the issue”.

The parties had challenged the COVID-19 emergency measures that were laid out in March 2020 by President Granger, in favour of a grouping of government ministers only, called the National COVID-19 Task Force.

Last month, the Central Board of Health (CBH) assumed its full responsibility of issuing and managing COVID-19 regulations, taking that power away from the Minister of Health, in keeping with the 1934 Public Health Ordinance of Guyana, following an Executive Order made by President Ali.

With this recent development, the application became redundant, and as such the Chief Justice was obliged to grant the application for withdrawal.

The application filed by the Guyana Teachers’ Union (GTU), the Guyana Public Service Union (GPSU), and their umbrella body, the Guyana Trades Union Congress (GTUC), came up for Case Management Conference (CMC) on Thursday at the Demerara High Court.

In their application, GPSU Vice-President Dawn Gardner, GTU General Secretary Coretta McDonald, and GTUC General Secretary Lincoln Lewis are all claiming that former President David Granger had exceeded his authority when he issued the first COVID-19 emergency measures back in March 2020, and are, therefore, calling for them to be quashed.

Back in September, High Court Judge Fidela Corbin-Lincoln had refused to grant the injunctions prayed for by the Unions.

The Unions had asked the court to grant them an Order preventing the State from implementing the vaccination requirements, and ordering the government to stand the cost of regular COVID-19 testing for all public servants.

In her ruling, the judge was at pains to explain that although the Court has jurisdiction to grant the injunctions at reference, it is in the public’s best interest not to do so, since it would be preventing the government from doing what it must to contain the spread of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) here.

“The world has been severely impacted by the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic; governments throughout the world have employed various measures to contain and reduce the spread of the virus. These measures include mandatory lockdowns, quarantines, curfews, and mask-wearing. The introduction of vaccines is the most recent effort to address the COVID-19 pandemic.

“The court is not deaf to the debate raging around the world, with respect to the ethicality and effectiveness of the vaccine; the legality of mandatory vaccine requirements is a reasonable infringement of constitutional rights. These matters are still to be tested in court,” Justice Corbin-Lincoln had said in her ruling.

The judge went on to say that while everything seems to suggest that vaccine hesitancy is a big issue here in Guyana, the government is doing everything it possibly can to keep the virus at bay, by implementing such measures as asking persons to show proof of vaccination or a negative PCR result before entering a public building.

Among other things the judge said at the time was that granting the interim injunctions would have been just a “temporary fix” of the situation.