I HAVE heard about the ERC and had my own views that it served no useful purpose. That was until I engaged with the ERC and realised the impact it was making.
While I have to be careful not to comment on the case before the court, I have some questions that Mr. Corbin and his cohorts in the PNCR must answer.
** (1)  Is it because he is unable to control the ERC that he is upset and has gone on a vendetta? If you don’t have a campaign based on race and ethnicity you should not be affected by the ERC.
** (2) Should I, as a voter, interpret the PNCR’s present position to be that their campaign is based on race and would like the competent authority to deal with such matters out of the way?
** (3)  If as Mr. Corbin claimed at his press conference that the ERC is unconstitutional since 2007, why did he not take the matter before the court before now? Is he trying to use the sloth of the court to drag on the matter until after elections so that he could execute his plans known only to him and his cohorts?
** (4) Could Mr. Corbin tell me and other peace-loving Guyanese in light of the PNCR’s present position, why should I vote PNCR at the next elections?
** (5) People in Guyana are not fools and they know when politics is being played out. What is Mr. Corbin’s alternative to the ERC? He must make this known sooner rather than later.
As an observer, the ERC is guilty of efficiency and success and wide grass-roots support which has earned the envy of Mr. Corbin and his colleagues in the PNCR.
If you do your work Mr. Corbin, you will get the results.
Who wants to listen to your racist agenda?
Guyanese have decided that you are naked before us. We see through you.
The ERC will be back and will continue to do its excellent work.