HOW do we lead by example if the mere act of engagement is based on deception? There seems to be a force integrated into our nature that exports the elements of deception while we postulate falsehoods with the intent to mislead and envelop. Even the most powerful nations fail to look back at our past. I insist the distant past, onward, and the endeavours of trickery, despite success on the field of conflict, and the application of false ideals and conduct, lead to resistance against imagery and philosophies that are eventually unmasked—either to have no merit, or realised to be one’s own, disguised, or mockery with intent to be the ‘WILL’ and riddle of the ‘Trickster’s deception’. With the past 60 years of human ideas and ideals that have led to so much misery, some conversations should be changed, and more transparent ideas should be debated.

The tragedy is that such falsehoods have become domesticated, in one of the worst places—‘THE HOME’. We cannot deny that the very home, whether young or mature, is embroiled in solving problems not through engagement between themselves, but before the throne of the Grim Reaper’s shadow. Our world is again embroiled by sectionalised power bases that, like the imposing teacher—though endowed with a fearsome posture and imposing literature—have no logical summary. Thus, the shortcomings cannot be interpreted to define balance and closure.

We are, for reasons of our own, rooted in that realm of constant imbalance, and whether we understand it or not, the common worker’s home is the balancing gatekeeper of society. Not the highwayman’s palace—what is there is understood, though it does not inspire; it is aware of. Too many in-house conflicts come quickly but leave with harsh consequences. Most of the time, the innocent occupants suffer, and amid the workers’ squabbles comes the predator. Amidst it all, it is our predicament too. It is time to stop concealing those who work with such issues; filled reports cannot help.

De lamentables