Alignment, not interference

GUYANA is undergoing a significant change in how its institutions operate. This contrasts sharply with the adversarial relationship between the executive and the judiciary that has often troubled democracies across the Caribbean and beyond.
Attorney General Anil Nandlall recently spoke about how the government and the judiciary are working together. This reflects a thoughtful approach to democratic governance that values respect for the constitution and real developmental results.
Nandlall made an important distinction between unilateral executive actions and collaborative efforts. Presidents with weaker institutions often launch broad judicial reform plans without meaningful input from those institutions that will carry them out. President Ali chose a different path. By consulting the judiciary before presenting his vision for the justice sector, the government showed that good governance involves not only achieving efficient results but also understanding the process that leads to them.
This consultative approach helps shield the reform agenda from claims of executive overreach, a constant concern when the independence of the judiciary is questioned. This cooperation is important because it appears fully genuine rather than just for show. The shared goals of the executive and the judiciary—from improving access to justice in remote areas to updating court systems—are not random compromises but a true meeting of institutional interests.
Both branches understand that a broken justice system benefits no one, especially in a developing country that aims to attract investment and establish the rule of law. The real successes demonstrate the credibility of this partnership. In the last five years, the government and the judiciary have worked together to rebuild courthouses in some of Guyana’s most isolated areas.
A court in Mahdia now has the same technological setup as one in Georgetown, while Port Kaituma has digital recording systems and air-conditioned rooms. This is more than just symbolic change. For people in remote communities who usually travel for days just to attend a short hearing, these improvements mean real access to justice.
The planned expansion to Wakenaam, Leguan, and Orealla further supports this idea, making sure that geography no longer determines a Guyanese citizen’s ability to seek legal help. The ongoing digital transformation—ranging from e-filing in the High Court and Court of Appeal to the upcoming digitisation of magistrates’ courts by mid-2026—addresses a persistent issue: ensuring reliable and consistent access to justice.
When case management systems rely on evidence and standardised procedures instead of judicial discretion, the outcomes are less likely to be biased. This is crucial for a nation where public trust in institutions has often been weak.
However, this outlook is not based on blind optimism. The real test of this partnership is yet to come. Consultations are essential, but they must lead to real results. The proposed new judicial complex in Georgetown, the legislative reforms for judicial accountability, and the timelines for digitisation must all be realised. The judiciary’s own seven-year strategic plan shows that it is ready for this modernisation. The executive’s budget commitment to these projects indicates political support.
What Guyana shows is that constitutional stability does not need to come from conflict between government branches or from executive power disguised as reform. It develops when institutions understand their dependence on each other and their shared duty to the public. The relationship between the executive and judiciary is not a weakness to exploit; it is a strength to build upon.
In a time when democracies are facing challenges around the world, Guyana’s approach to consultative governance offers a unique example. It demonstrates that a vision grounded in institutional cooperation and constitutional respect can enhance both development and democracy. The current reforms in the justice sector represents responsible governance, and this distinction is very important.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE :
Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
All our printed editions are available online
emblem3
Subscribe to the Guyana Chronicle.
Sign up to receive news and updates.
We respect your privacy.