DOES a majority of Guyanese know who or what Mossad is? I hope this article here makes a contribution to Guyanese understanding it.

Mossad is the secret service of the state of Israel. It is a terroristic killing machine and each one of its head, past and present, is guilty of crimes against humanity.

The role of Mossad is to kill Palestinian freedom fighters, academics and journalists who write sympathetically of the Palestinian cause.

Mossad’s raison d’être is to ensure that those who fight for a Palestinian state, whether in Gaza, the West Bank or neighbouring countries are targeted for assassination. Mossad has been and is a sponsor of state terrorism. Mossad is a terroristic organisation that is a threat to world peace.

This killing machine is becoming jittery because there is suspicion that it was behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk. What has been happening lately is a transformation in the US of extremely right-wing advocates that is discomforting Mossad.

Influential people that you thought would never criticise Israel have been speaking out against Israeli acts of genocide. Two of them are the prominent influencer, Candace Owen, and ultra-right congresswoman, Marjorie Green.

The outspokenness of these two women has scared Mossad because these two women are influential. Kirk’s followers have posed the most serious threat to the genocidal regime in Israel.

Kirk was very influential among American MAGA youths, right-wing religious groups, and the Conservative world in the US. Kirk’s followers began to carp on a particular subject that aroused Mossad’s interest in them.

Kirk’s followers put a simple question to the American people – why should a great power like the US be subordinate to the interest of a small country with a small population like Israel. These right-wing extremists advocated that the US stop being dictated to by Israel.

From the time he was murdered, the American Government, the Republican Party and mainstream journalism pointed to a left-wing conspiracy. This quickly shifted suspicion of Mossad’s involvement.

Imagine a Guyanese academic who once worked in the UN Human Rights Commission, last Wednesday, referred to one of the longest serving Mossad terrorists, its former head, Yossi Cohen, as a humanist and a philosopher.

A man who ordered the assassination of Palestinian freedom fighters, pro-Palestinian academics and journalists around the world in hotels, airports, restaurants and open public spaces is described as a philosopher and humanist and the Stabroek News published that despicability.

Cohen served for 38 years in Mossad and probably has personally ordered the killing of more people than any previous secret service employee of any government including the CIA.

Ramcharan’s writing on Cohen took the form of a review of Cohen’s memoir. It is one of the stupidest reviews of a memoir I have ever read.

When you review an autobiography, you have to juxtapose what the author says with the acts of injustice, indiscretion, mischief and immoralities he/she is known for. Ramcharan has to be an incompetent academic.

Ramcharan quotes Cohen saying that Israel must win, Israel must never allow itself to be defeated. Nowhere in his review, Ramcharan makes a note about an occupying power’s impossible mission of not being defeated. Ramcharan fails to remind his readers that Israel’s raison d’être is expansion to achieve greater Israel by forcefully taking other people’s land.

Ramcharan is analysing Cohen’s memoir without any mention whatsoever that Israel is currently committing genocide. Ramcharan descends to levels of asininity when he quotes Cohen as saying that he is a man of peace. How can Cohen be a man of peace when for 38 years in Mossad he has been involved in killing innocent people?

I am questioning how the hell Ramcharan reached to the level of being an employee of the UN Human Rights Commission. There are basic standards that must be adhered to in book reviewing and the reviewer must comply with those guidelines. For example, if a statesman said he believes in peace and he is known for invading other countries, the reviewer has to mention that.

Just one potent example should suffice. He quotes Cohen as saying that Israel will prevent any Middle East country from having a nuclear option. It was compulsory that he should state Israel has no right to determine that when Israel itself has nuclear weapons.

Ramcharan didn’t mention that to prevent other countries from having nuclear weapons that Mossad under Cohen’s leadership went about assassinating scientists from other Middle East countries.

The reason why Cohen has killed countless people and survived for 38 years in Mossad is because other secret services in other Arab countries have not targeted him. Or maybe they did but this long surviving state terrorist survived.

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Guyana National Newspapers Limited.