–Bhagwandin emphasises, points to France as most recent example

IN the ongoing talk about minority governments in some circles, Financial Analyst Joel Bhagwandin has pointed to the global reality that such a government structure has always failed.
Drawing from Guyana’s own experience between 2011 and 2015, Bhagwandin, in a post on his Facebook page, highlighted a period marked by legislative gridlock and economic uncertainty under a minority government.

“Critical bills were delayed, national budgets faced significant cuts, and the country narrowly avoided blacklisting by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (CFATF) due to unresolved gaps in anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing frameworks,” he said.
These challenges culminated in snap elections in 2015, signaling the unsustainability of the minority rule.

Bhagwandin further illustrated the broader risks of minority governments by pointing to recent events in Europe.
Reports of a potential collapse of a French minority government had led to economic stalemate, echoing the difficulties seen in Guyana’s earlier experience.
The parallels between these cases underscore the skepticism surrounding minority governments’ ability to provide stable, effective governance, raising questions about their viability as a sustainable political model.

The cautionary tales suggest that minority governments often struggle with legislative paralysis and economic instability, underscoring why many nations revert to majority rule to safeguard governance and economic progress.