IN a refreshing show of democratic engagement, the People’s Progressive Party (PPP) has been inundated with ideas and suggestions from Guyanese citizens at home and abroad—an overwhelming response to the party’s public call for contributions to shape its next term in office. According to General Secretary Bharrat Jagdeo, the volume and depth of the submissions not only signal active civic interest but confirm that the party’s vision is resonating with the aspirations of the people.

More than 1,500 responses via WhatsApp and over 100 written submissions suggest something significant: Guyanese citizens are not only paying attention—they are eager to be part of the national conversation. This is democracy in action, and the PPP’s invitation for input is a commendable step toward collaborative governance.

The suggestions cover a wide array of concerns—from foreign policy to fixing local drainage systems—proving that citizens care deeply about both the big picture and the everyday realities of life in Guyana. The fact that the General Secretary himself took the time to respond to questions and offer clarifications demonstrates the kind of accountability and responsiveness that citizens hope for from their leaders.

In addressing specific policy areas, Jagdeo reaffirmed the party’s commitment to social support programmes, including continued cash grants, increases in old-age pensions, and tax relief. These are critical signals that the PPP intends to maintain and build upon the welfare gains made in recent years. Also noteworthy is the promise of improved sporting infrastructure across both the coast and hinterland—a meaningful move toward inclusivity and youth development.

Importantly, Jagdeo did not shy away from criticizing the Opposition-led Mayor and City Council (M&CC) for its apparent failure in managing Georgetown’s affairs, forcing the central government to step in. While this points to deeper governance issues at the municipal level, it also underscores the need for administrative reform and a more cohesive approach to urban management.

From removing derelict vehicles to planning economic zones in rural areas, the citizen-driven proposals reflect both frustration with longstanding problems and hope for practical, forward-thinking solutions. The call for relocating disruptive industrial businesses from residential zones, as well as suggestions to improve school transport and provide free utilities to places of worship, all reflect a populace that is thinking constructively and communally.

The PPP’s next challenge is to ensure that these contributions are not merely symbolic but are actively considered and implemented where feasible. If this engagement truly shapes policy, it could set a powerful precedent for participatory governance in Guyana.

This moment should not be underestimated. It reveals not only confidence in the PPP’s leadership but a renewed sense of civic duty among the people. If nurtured properly, this could mark the beginning of a deeper, more meaningful relationship between government and citizen—one based on trust, dialogue, and shared responsibility for the nation’s future.