THE recent statements made by Aubrey Norton, leader of the People’s National Congress Reform (PNCR), regarding foreign voters in Guyana have sparked significant concern from the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM).

Norton’s claim that opposition polling agents will actively seek to block foreigners from voting is not only misleading but also poses a serious threat to the integrity of the electoral process and the rights of eligible voters.

GECOM has rightly emphasised that all individuals listed on the Official List of Electors (OLE) have undergone rigorous scrutiny to ensure they meet the eligibility criteria established by law. According to the National Registration Act, only citizens of Guyana and certain Commonwealth citizens who have resided in the country for a year or more are eligible to register.

This legal framework is designed to protect the electoral process from fraud and ensure that only qualified individuals participate in elections. Norton’s assertion that polling agents will identify “foreigners” based on their language skills is particularly troubling.

It undermines the provisions outlined in Section 72 (10) of the Representation of the People Act, which allows for interpreters to assist voters who may not fully understand English.

Such a stance not only risks disenfranchising legitimate voters but also fosters an atmosphere of fear and intimidation at polling stations.

Misinformation can have dire consequences in any democratic society, especially during an election cycle. By suggesting that foreign individuals will be prevented from voting, Norton is sowing seeds of distrust among voters. This rhetoric can lead to confusion and anxiety among eligible voters who may fear being unjustly challenged or turned away at the polls. The implications are clear: when citizens feel threatened or unwelcome, their participation in democracy diminishes, ultimately weakening the electoral process.

Moreover, GECOM’s warning about potential legal repercussions for those who interfere with the voting process underscores the seriousness of this matter.

Political party agents do not possess the authority to determine voter eligibility; that responsibility lies solely with GECOM. Any attempt to obstruct or intimidate voters is not only unethical but also illegal. Political leaders must recognise their influence and act responsibly to foster a fair electoral environment.

As we approach upcoming elections, it is imperative that political leaders prioritise truthfulness and transparency over sensationalism. Statements such as Norton’s not only misrepresent the facts but also jeopardise the democratic values that underpin our society. Political discourse should aim to uplift and inform rather than instil fear and division.

In this context, GECOM’s call for political stakeholders to exercise caution in their public statements is vital. Leaders must understand that their words carry weight and can significantly impact public perception and voter behaviour.

It is essential for all parties involved in the electoral process to work collaboratively towards ensuring a fair, transparent, and inclusive election. Only then can we truly honour our democratic principles and ensure that every voice is heard on Election Day.