IN a troubling turn of events, Carol Trim-Bagot, a councillor for the People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C) on the New Amsterdam Town Council, has found herself suspended by the Mayor of the APNU-led council.
This incident raises significant concerns, not just about the political landscape in Guyana but about the fundamental principles of transparency, accountability, and fair governance.
Trim-Bagot’s suspension appears less about her conduct and more about a systematic effort to silence dissent within local government. Her insistence on accountability regarding the APNU-led town council’s financial management has clearly made her a target for those who prefer to operate in the shadows, free from scrutiny.

The claim of “disorderly behaviour” levelled against her seems to be a façade for what is essentially a political manoeuver designed to stifle legitimate criticism, and discourage active participation in local governance.
The argument made by Trim-Bagot regarding the improper application of Chapter 28:01 of the Municipal and District Councils Act is not just a technicality; it highlights a serious flaw in the Council’s operations.
The fact that no formal communication was provided to her before the motion for suspension was introduced is indicative of a deeper issue: A council that prioritises expedience and control over the integrity of its processes. If local councils are to function effectively, they must uphold democratic principles, including due process and transparency.

The APNU’s alleged tactics of intimidation, as described by Trim-Bagot, underscore a concerning trend where political power is used to marginalise dissenting voices. When council decisions are made behind closed doors, and significant issues are not brought to the floor for open discussion, it creates an environment ripe for corruption and mismanagement.

In such a context, the people of New Amsterdam are left in the dark, unaware of how their town’s affairs are being handled.
Moreover, the absence of PPP/C councillors on the finance committee exacerbates this issue. Decisions affecting public funds should not be made without comprehensive input from all elected representatives, particularly those who are directly accountable to the community.
The idea that a select few can make significant financial decisions without adequate oversight undermines the trust placed in local government, and breeds an atmosphere of suspicion.

As citizens of New Amsterdam, and, by extension all of Guyana, we must remain vigilant. We must support those who are willing to challenge the status quo; who advocate for transparency, and who seek to ensure that our local councils are places of open dialogue rather than political battlegrounds.
The suspension of Trim-Bagot is a call to action for all who value democracy and accountability in governance.

The events surrounding Trim-Bagot’s suspension should serve as a wake-up call. It is crucial that we protect the rights of elected officials to question, to advocate, and to serve their communities without fear of retribution.
If we allow intimidation to flourish in our local governments, we risk losing the very essence of democracy. The fight for transparency and accountability must continue, and it starts with us; demanding a council that works for all, not just a privileged few.