Dear Editor,
I WRITE in response to Mr. Sherwood Low’s letter published on September 20, 2024, in which he critiques the government’s approach to community development and alleges that it undermines the regional and local government system. While I respect Mr. Low’s right to express his opinions, I find his arguments myopic and misleading.
First, Mr. Low’s position is incredibly narrow and fails to consider the broader implications of a government that actively engages its citizens.

The notion that President Irfaan Ali’s visits to communities are somehow a bad thing is flawed. A government that listens to the voices of the people it serves—whether through regional authorities or direct engagement—enhances, rather than diminishes, governance. This is in stark contrast to the top-down, disconnected approach we saw under previous administrations, where promises were made without any follow-through.
Contrary to Mr. Low’s claims, the regional and local government systems are not undermined by President Ali’s community visits. These visits ensure that the needs of the people are addressed in a timely and effective manner, while still working within the framework of national and regional development plans. It’s worth noting that many of these projects arise from demands voiced by citizens through their regional representatives, a process that the government respects and values.

Furthermore, Mr. Low’s assertion that such engagements are politicised misses the larger point: a government that consults with its citizens is not to be criticised, but applauded. There is nothing inherently “crude” or “ridiculous” about a government being responsive and visible. In fact, it is a vital part of ensuring that development initiatives are closely aligned with the needs and priorities of the people. This direct engagement builds trust, transparency, and accountability—qualities any government should strive for.

Finally, Mr. Low seems intent on distracting from a critical point. He takes issue with the Department of Public Information’s report because it highlights the delivery of a promise made by President Ali—a promise kept. This is in stark contrast to the APNU+AFC government, which failed to deliver on its promises during its tenure from 2015 to 2020. The current administration’s efforts to fulfill commitments made to communities is an indication of its determination to rectify the neglect of the previous government. Mr. Low’s critique does little more than attempt to divert attention from this fact.
President Irfaan Ali’s visits, along with his government’s proactive approach to community development, should be seen as a step toward inclusive and responsive governance. Criticism that ignores this reality risks distorting the truth and misleading the public.
Sincerely,
Alvin Hamilton