Dear Editor,

I AM compelled to respond to Ms. Beverly Alert’s recent letter concerning the scheduling of a parliamentary sitting on the eve of Emancipation Day 2024.
Her assertion that the timing of this sitting is a deliberate attempt to disrespect our history or African ancestors is misguided. It detracts from the essential business of the people while attempting to stir the pot of racial sentiments, a signature tactic of the opposition.
Firstly, it is important to recognise that the business of the people should not be contingent upon national holidays. The Parliament of Guyana has a history of meeting on the eve of significant holidays without any accusations of disrespect or undermining the importance of those days.
For instance, the Parliament convened on February 22, 2024, the eve of our Republic anniversary. Additionally, sittings took place on May 4, 2016, the eve of Arrival Day, and April 14, 2017, the eve of Good Friday. On these occasions, Ms. Alert did not raise any concerns.
These examples clearly demonstrate that scheduling parliamentary sittings on the eve of significant holidays is not unprecedented, and does not, in any way, diminish the respect and observance of these important occasions.
The suggestion that holding a parliamentary sitting on July 31 diminishes the significance of Emancipation Day, or disrespects our African ancestors is unfounded.
Emancipation Day is a day of profound historical importance and national pride, and it is essential to honour it through meaningful observance and participation in ceremonies. However, it is equally important to ensure that the work of Parliament, which ultimately serves the People of Guyana, continues uninterrupted.
The Libation Ceremony and other commemorative events are vital, and Members of Parliament, like all citizens, should strive to participate in and honour these traditions. Yet, postponing parliamentary sittings every time they coincide with the eve of a holiday would set a precedent that could hamper the efficiency and continuity of parliamentary duties.
While Ms. Alert’s sentiments may be understandable at face value, it is essential to maintain a balanced perspective.
The Parliament has historically met on the eve of various significant holidays, and this practice has not undermined the importance of those days. Emancipation Day deserves full respect and observance, but the business of the people must proceed without unnecessary interruptions.
Let us work towards honouring our ancestors and history while ensuring that the Parliamentary responsibilities of elected officials are met diligently.
Yours truly,
Brian Azore