Dear Editor,
I AM compelled to express my deep concern and alarm regarding the potential candidacy of Mr. Hughes for the highest office in the land. As a citizen of Guyana, I am duty-bound to speak out against this individual’s campaign bid, given his questionable track record and lack of commitment to the well-being of our nation.
Mr. Hughes’ history of prioritising personal interests over the nation’s progress is a matter of public record. His actions, or lack thereof, have contributed significantly to the country’s stagnation in the 21st Century. It is alarming to think that someone with such a history could be entrusted with the responsibility of leading our country.
One of the most egregious examples of his disregard for the Rule of Law and democratic principles was the decision to take the matter of the No-confidence Motion to the courts, which eventually ended at the highest court in the region, arguing that 33 is not the majority of 65. This move was a blatant attempt to subvert the will of the people, and cling to power at all costs. The international community was left aghast at this brazen display of disregard for democratic norms, and our nation was left to suffer the consequences of this embarrassment.
Furthermore, his recent indication of “client first then country” is a stark reminder of his self-serving agenda, which is antithetical to the principles of public service.
This attitude is a clear indication that he would prioritise personal interests over the welfare and interests of the nation and its people.
Guyana is on track to becoming a global player, garnering international attention and investments. In light of this, it is even more imperative that we reject Mr. Hughes’ bid for the presidency, or any public office. We cannot afford to go back to the dark days of political manipulation and stagnation.
We deserve a leader who will put the interests of Guyana and its people above their own personal ambitions. We must learn from the mistakes of the past, and ensure that our leaders are held accountable for their actions.
As we approach future elections, it is crucial that we, as citizens, remain vigilant and informed about the character and track record of those seeking public office.
We must not forget the lessons of the past and the harm that Mr. Hughes’ actions have caused our nation. It is our collective responsibility to ensure that our elected representatives prioritise the greater good and work towards the betterment of our country, rather than pursuing personal interests.
I urge your readers to exercise their democratic right, and carefully consider the implications of electing Mr. Hughes to any public office. It is our duty to protect the integrity of our democratic institutions, and the well-being of our nation.
Sincerely,
Hemraj Vishaul Kissoon