IN recent events concerning the Guyanese diaspora community in New York, a troubling call for boycott emerged, stirring controversy and threatening the unity and freedom of expression among its members.

Rickford Burke, the head of the Caribbean Guyana Institute for Democracy (CGID), advocated for boycotting Guyanese-owned businesses that welcomed President Dr. Irfaan Ali during his visit to New York.

This move was met with strong condemnation from civil and human rights lawyer Selwyn Pieters, who emphasised the fundamental importance of freedom of expression and unity within the community.
Pieters’ response reflects a crucial aspect of democratic societies: The protection of individual liberties, including the right to express political opinions freely.

Welcoming a Head of State into a commercial establishment should not be interpreted as a partisan act but rather as a manifestation of patriotism and hospitality. Any attempt to stifle such expressions not only infringes upon the rights of business owners but also threatens the cohesion of the community.

Moreover, Pieters rightfully highlights the potential repercussions of boycotting small businesses within the Guyanese diaspora. Such actions could inflict financial harm and instill fear among entrepreneurs who simply exercised their freedom of expression. It is imperative for the citizens of New York to stand in solidarity with these businesses, demonstrating their support for civil liberties and rejecting divisive measures.

President Dr. Irfaan Ali also responded appropriately to the boycott calls, and exemplified leadership by urging critics to direct their grievances towards him rather than targeting the community.
His emphasis on unity and resilience against divisive rhetoric is commendable, particularly amidst attempts to sow seeds of discord within the Guyanese diaspora. President Ali’s commitment to fostering solidarity underscores the importance of collective strength in confronting challenges and advancing shared goals.

Furthermore, President Ali’s call for scrutiny of organisations like the CGID, which engage in divisive actions, is a necessary step towards safeguarding community cohesion. Leaders who propagate separatist agendas must be held accountable for their actions, especially when they undermine the unity and well-being of diaspora communities.

It is crucial to contextualize Rickford Burke’s involvement in the broader narrative. His history of inciting racial strife underscores the divisive nature of his actions. Also, as a wanted individual by the Guyana Police Force, Burke’s credibility in advocating for the community’s interests is highly questionable.

As the community navigates through challenges, it is essential to remain vigilant in protecting civil liberties and rejecting efforts to sow seeds of discord and division.