IN the ongoing saga of the Guyana Teachers’ Union (GTU) strike, two senior educators have stepped forward, challenging the very foundation of the union’s leadership and its strategies.

Sheikh Ahmad, the Headmaster of the Essequibo Islands Secondary School, and Shandrina Welcome-Lee, the Headmistress of The Bishops’ High School, have voiced their disapproval, calling for a return to negotiations with the government and constructive dialogue to prioritise the educational needs of the nation’s children.

Ahmad, drawing from his extensive experience spanning over a quarter of a century, offers a poignant critique of the GTU’s actions. His decision not to participate in the strike stems from a results-driven approach and a deep-rooted commitment to his students.

He highlighted the significant progress and support provided by the government, juxtaposed with what he perceives as the GTU’s failure to adequately support teachers during the pandemic. Ahmad’s pragmatic stance underscores the need for union leadership to align with the everyday realities of educators.

Moreover, Ahmad’s call for a more inclusive dialogue at the grassroots level exposes the disconnect between union leadership and the concerns of teachers on the ground. It’s a call for transparency, accountability, and a recognition of the complexities of the education sector.

Welcome-Lee echoed Ahmad’s sentiments, emphasizing the divisive nature of the strike and advocating for personal choice and professional integrity among educators. Her focus on practical enhancements in educational delivery and infrastructure underscores the tangible benefits resulting from government initiatives and investments.

The government’s efforts, including simplifying administrative processes, financial grants to schools, and investments in technology and resources, have directly impacted students and teachers, enhancing the quality of education across the country.

Also, the PPP/C government, in just three short years, has already addressed more than half of the 41 requests made by the GTU for better working conditions, with discussions ongoing to address the remainder.

Amidst this, the GTU’s leadership, embodied by Coretta McDonald, seems shrouded in ambiguity. McDonald’s assurance of corporate sponsors covering potential salary deductions for striking teachers raises more questions than answers.

The lack of transparency regarding these sponsors and the distribution of funds raises concerns about the union’s accountability and its ability to effectively represent the interests of its members.

As the strike continues to polarize the education sector, Ahmad and Welcome-Lee’s call for dialogue and unity is a beacon of hope. It’s a reminder that the ultimate goal should be the well-being and future of Guyana’s children, transcending individual agendas and egos.

In the face of this issue, it is imperative for teachers not to be misled by the actions of GTU elements who have a clear political bias and are driven by their party’s agenda of divisiveness. The avenue clearly exists for a resolution that fosters a nurturing and inclusive educational environment. The future of Guyana’s education system depends on it.