IN recent weeks, the South American nation of Guyana has found itself at the centre of an escalating territorial controversy with its neighbour, Venezuela.

This controversy, which has deep historical roots, has once again reared its head, with Venezuela making renewed claims to territory that indisputably belongs to Guyana.

In response to this provocation, Guyana’s President, Dr. Irfaan Ali, has taken a firm and responsible stance, assuring the nation that his government will defend Guyana’s land in accordance with international law, particularly in light of the ongoing case before the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

Guyana is seeking a final and binding judgement that the 1899 Arbitral Award, which established the location of the land boundary between then British Guiana and Venezuela, remains valid and that the Essequibo region belongs to Guyana and not Venezuela.

First and foremost, it is imperative to recognise Guyana’s unwavering commitment to maintain its sovereignty and territorial integrity. This nation, despite its size, possesses the strength of conviction that comes from a history of perseverance in the face of adversity.

The recent actions by Venezuela to lay claim to Guyanese territory are not only legally baseless, but also inconsiderate of the principles of international law and the mechanisms in place to address such issues.

President Ali’s assertion that Guyana will uphold its rights in accordance with international law is not just a statement; it is a resounding declaration of Guyana’s commitment to the rule of law, peaceful resolution, and the principles of justice.

The matter being brought before the ICJ underscores Guyana’s faith in the international legal system as a means to achieve a just and lasting resolution to this controversy. It is an action that showcases Guyana’s maturity as a responsible member of the international community.

It is also crucial to highlight that Guyana’s response to Venezuela’s actions has been marked by diplomacy and responsibility. President Ali has consistently stressed the importance of peaceful dialogue, emphasising that the path forward should be one of negotiations and not military confrontation. This approach reflects a commitment to preserving regional stability and a deep understanding of the consequences of reckless aggression.

In contrast to Guyana’s responsible posture, Venezuela’s attempts to assert its claims through intimidation and aggressive rhetoric are both counterproductive and detrimental to the entire Region. The international community, including the Commonwealth, CARICOM and the OAS have extended their support to Guyana and urged Venezuela to abide by established norms of diplomacy and international law.

Guyana’s stance is not one of belligerence, but rather of steadfast determination to protect its rights. The nation seeks justice and resolution through legal means, not the escalation of hostilities. It is this very responsible approach that should serve as an example for nations facing similar challenges around the world.

As responsible citizens of the world, we should commend and support such resolute efforts in the pursuit of a just and lasting resolution to territorial controversies.