There appear to be something wrong about the jailing of the police inspector

Dear Editor
RECENT information in the print and electronic media revealed that Magistrate Rondel Weaver, at the Georgetown Magistrates’ Court, sentenced police inspector, Prem Narine, to seven days in prison.

During the course of the same day, his attorneys-at-law petitioned the Acting Chief Justice, Roxanne George-Wiltshire, who ordered the policeman’s immediate release. I am not au fait with all the facts in issue or facts relevant to the issue in relation to this case. However, it is apparent that there was some exchange of words and other issues in open Court between the police inspector and the magistrate, who in her own judgement deemed the conduct of the policeman as contemptuous. No charge was read to the policeman. According to him, the Magistrate told him that he was in Contempt of Court and sentenced him to seven days in prison– all in one breath.

The process leading up to the jailing of the policeman appeared to be flawed. It was not in keeping with natural justice and standard operating court procedures. The principle of the Right To Be Heard was dashed out of the Court’s window. The inspector was not given the opportunity to defend himself or to have an attorney to plead his case. Prisoners are entitled to this right, more so, policemen. He was cited for some alleged contemptuous act and immediately sentenced to seven days in prison. Luckily, during the day in question, his attorneys-at-law were given a hearing by the Acting Chief Justice who ruled against the magistrate and ordered the release of the inspector before the rising of the Court. I am not certain what was the exact offence the law enforcement officer committed? Not certain if a charge of Contempt of Court lies within the ambit of the Magistrate’s Court. Certainly, it is within the remit of the High Court.

Flashback! A few decades ago, Justice Keith Massiah, in the High Court, cited a prominent attorney-at -law for Contempt of Court. It was during the morning session of the court proceedings. He ordered the Court Orderly to arrest the attorney-at-law and keep him there until 1.00 pm that day. Unlike Magistrate Rondel Weaver, Justice Keith Massiah instructed the attorney-at-law to appear before him at the appointed time with his defence team and address him, “or the jaws of the Georgetown Prison will open up and swallow him.”

As instructed, the accused appeared before the Justice with a battery of attorneys-at-law, including some senior counsels. The defence was adequately put to the Judge who warned the accused. End of the case. The Right To Be Heard is a God-Given right. It is not only pertinent for legal matters but in resolving conflicts in our daily lives and living. It started in Genesis when Adam and Eve committed themselves. Although God knew exactly what took place, he did not pass judgement on them immediately. Instead, he called them and inquired what happened before imposing judgement. That is how it was in the beginning, so shall it be in the end. No one must be allowed to take away that right from us.
I hasten to commend the members of the defence team of Inspector Prem Narine for their prompt and intelligent action in successfully petitioning the Acting Chief Justice on behalf of their client and to salute her for not only giving them a hearing, but taking swift, certain and appropriate action which abbreviated a shocking case of miscarriage of justice committed by Magistrate Rondel Weaver. Hope that inspector Prem Narine will take legal action to expunge from the records the conviction imposed on him.

Regards
Clinton Conway

SHARE THIS ARTICLE :
Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
All our printed editions are available online
emblem3
Subscribe to the Guyana Chronicle.
Sign up to receive news and updates.
We respect your privacy.