The Marijuana debate

IT augurs well for a society when its citizens can have open, frank and honest discourse on matters of importance to them. It is the essence of democracy; for, in giving expression to views and in sharing ideas and knowledge, we, humankind, engage in exercising one of the most basic, yet taken-for-granted functions of our social existence and growth.Whether one is a supporter or user of marijuana (“ganga” or “pot”) and/or hemp is not the focus of the discussion here; our focus is that, in the exercise of respect to our fellow man, tolerance will be brought to bear on a discussion that has been ongoing for years, but has been brought to the fore in fits and starts. It has emerged yet again, and in this instance with more intensity, focus and militancy.

What the society knows is that marijuana is a criminalised product. The society is aware of police raids and captures. Persons caught in using or possessing this substance, or planting it, are liable for prosecution and incarceration. What is also known is that penalty seems to be at the discretion of the presiding magistrate. There has been public condemnation of the penalty attached to the possession and/or use of this substance; the absence of universality in convictions in regard to cases involving this substance; comparison of penalty attached to convictions in regard to this substance with other substances that are considered hard drugs; and calls for a review of its criminalisation.

Society has also seen users of the product ‘getting high’ and displaying pleasant and not so pleasant reactions and conduct.
At a cultural level, marijuana is seen by our Rastafarian brothers and sisters as a “wisdom weed”, the usage of which forms part of their religious beliefs and praxis. Musicians, the most notable of whom was Robert “Bob” Marley, have celebrated its usage in songs, and have openly used it on stage. Its usage has also been seen in movies, including its paraphernalia with the gathering of users in communal interaction. Open smoking of marijuana was, moreover, seen as an act of resistance to sections of society and the political system that saw Rastafarians as fringe elements.

In short, marijuana use is part of our culture, and has been revered by some, celebrated by others, and shunned by most.

Unlike marijuana, hemp (a type of marijuana plant) is not known to the society, and conversations on this will also be useful in helping to bring about knowledge, and create awareness and understanding. Additionally, there are other sides to these products that the society is deserving of knowing because they would lend to society being more informed and would guide actions and reactions going forward.

The academic community has weighed in on the matter. Our Caribbean sociologist Dr Barry Chevannes has proposed the possibility of expanding the use of the product in pharmacology and in industry, along with government playing a role through an intensive education drive, particularly among young people, to reduce the demand for the drug. It is said that in the 1970s, two University of the West Indies (UWI) researchers developed from marijuana a drug called Canasol for the treatment of glaucoma. Hemp has also been found to have several industrial applications, including in the manufacture of rope, cloth, and other products.
And while recreational use of marijuana remains controversial, medical practitioners have advanced its utility as a drug in dealing with illnesses such as cancer and glaucoma.

The USA National Eye Institute reported thus: “Studies in the early 1970s showed that marijuana, when smoked, lowered intraocular pressure (IOP) in people with normal pressure and those with glaucoma” and may slow the progression of the disease, preventing blindness. In the USA, 20 states have decriminalised marijuana for medical use. Jamaica has amended its drug law which partially decriminalises small amounts to allow for lawful medical use, a reform that has been described by Minister of Justice Mark Golding as “long overdue.”

This is not to say that there is no adverse side effect in the use of marijuana. For it has been found that overuse can lead to dependency and alter memory and emotions.

There is also a business (economic) side to the production and sale of the product and its by-products. In addition to creating income opportunities, states also stand to benefit through taxation. For instance, Colorado, one of the first two USA states to legalise marijuana in 2012, garnered tax revenue of
US$44 million in 2014, which has moved to US$73.5 million in the first seven months of this year; and if kept apace, is projected to reached US$125 million. We are encouraged that the conversations are being had around these issues, because they can lead to shaping knowledge and understanding of the usage, policies and laws governing the product.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE :
Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
All our printed editions are available online
emblem3
Subscribe to the Guyana Chronicle.
Sign up to receive news and updates.
We respect your privacy.