The Alliance for Change’s (AFC) poorly worded, badly punctuated, ill-conceptualized commentary on the action taken by the Government in questioning the Suriname map that includes Guyana’s territory and the competency of Janette Bulkan, is divisive and contemptuous.

On the issue of climate change, the integrity of Guyana’s government is unquestionable and shows continuity on a path of environmentalism, significantly highlighted by Dr. Jagan’s contribution of portions of our hinterland to the world in 1993 at the Rio Summit, and President Jagdeo’s stewardship of climate change discussions, nationally, regionally and internationally, in 2009.

While the President, supremely qualified to do so, is the architect of several policies, the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS) is a product of unified effort. Lauded by the United States, within CARICOM and further afield, the LCDS has become a model used by others to ensure the survival of the low-lying and island territories.

With a unit established and dedicated to climate change evaluation and awareness, consultations have been held country-wide, with all sections of the population, from the indigenous communities of the hinterland, to the security forces, entrepreneurs and the private sector, civil society, religious and social groups, and in schools, with the next generation of Guyana’s teachers, nurses, lawyers, physicians, builders and leaders. Government cannot be faulted in this regard.

In the statement “…President Jagdeo continues to travel the world seeking support for his Low Carbon Development Strategy…”, let’s be clear on this point; the President continues to represent himself as the Head of State of an independent nation where citizens participate and dialogue openly on the development that manifest therein.

To accuse the Administration of not caring for Guyanese beyond our territorial borders is an indication of the antiquated notions that permeate in that party. The President boldly rose to the defense of Guyanese in the Caribbean when they were targeted by immigration authorities in neighbouring Caribbean states, decrying ill-treatment of its citizens.

Since the recent devastating earthquake in Haiti, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has issued a release stating that this Government is prepared to finance the return to Guyana of nationals living in Haiti. This is no small, inexpensive effort and a clear indication that the Administration cares.

Guyana’s role in the regional integration process remains in tandem with its historical position on Caribbean unity, one of openness and inclusion. As the home of the regional Secretariat, Guyanese hospitality continues to extend itself to all who enter. We have defended our territorial integrity with intellectual maturity, the basis of diplomatic relations with other nations. Suriname is not excluded in this regard.

Those who choose to exclude themselves of the on-going process of growth in Guyana cannot then critique the efforts of others who, in spite of differences, continue to commit to ensure that this country prospers in the face of odds.

National pride should stand as the benchmark of analysis and presentation of issues. Philosophical and party differences will fade into the background when one is asked, “So where were you born?” That is the reality.

The maintenance of our territorial integrity is essential, recognizing the efforts of our predecessors, the work of those presently toiling in service to their country and the preservation of a rich legacy for the future generation of Guyanese.
Timothy Sears