Poor quality seed paddy… Mohamed Khan has his facts all wrong

THE Guyana Rice Producers Association (RPA) would like to bring to the public’s attention, especially rice farmers in Region 2, several inaccuracies penned by Mr. Mohamed Khan in his letter published in the Stabroek News on April 14, 2015.Firstly, the RPA is of the strong belief that this letter writer has his facts all wrong, and seems to have lost his way, since his thoughts seemed to be tripping over each other like a person with a “beer-soaked brain”. This is so because the RPA has been providing high-quality seed paddy to rice farmers for the past 14 years under its Seed Paddy Production Programme.

During this time, thousands of rice farmers throughout the country have benefited from easy access to high-quality seed paddy at an affordable cost. Also, the Seed Programme has expanded significantly. As a result, the RPA has invested heavily in expanding and upgrading its seed cleaning and drying equipment to meet the high demand for seed. Currently, the Association is unable to meet the high demand for seed by rice farmers.
The seed cleaner that Mr. Mohamed Khan is referring to was replaced more than eight years ago with a seven- stage, state-of-the art seed cleaner that has produced, and continues to produce, excellent results that meet the FAO’s seed specifications that the RPA uses to certify seed. It seems that Mr. Khan is unaware of this fact.
Secondly, all the RPA’s contracted Seed Grower’s fields have to be certified by the Guyana Rice Development Board (GRDB). This body ensures that both the field and seed meet the FAO’s seed quality standards before the seed is sold to farmers. In addition, germination tests and purity analyses are carried out before seed paddy are sold to farmers. These systems of checks have been in place from the inception of the seed programme, and were requirements that the RPA had to meet before funding was approved by several international funding agencies which made the RPA seed programme a reality. Mr. Khan is aware of this, since as he stated in his letter he was once employed by the RPA as a Field Officer when the seed programme coomenced.
The statement by Mr. Khan that he viewed seed samples sold by the RPA to farmers for the upcoming Spring Crop that has more than 50% damaged paddy grain and wind is totally untrue and misleading. At the time when Mr. Khan penned his letter, the RPA had not even sold one bag of seed to any farmer. Mr. Khan of all people should know that seed this bad (more that 50% damaged) would surely be rejected before it even enters the RPA seed facility.
Both the production of seed paddy in the fields and the processing of seed at all the RPA seed facilities in the country are closely monitored. Frequent field visits are made by both RPA and GRDB field officers. This ensures that all seed sold to farmers are of the highest quality; and in the event that any farmer(s) has/have any issue(s) concerning seed purchased from the organisation, these are always addressed to the satisfaction of the farmer(s).
The RPA realises that the rice industry does have issues that need to be addressed or improved, since there is never a perfect system. The Association sincerely hopes that Mr. Khan is aware of this fact. It would also like to advise Mr. Khan that in the future, his criticisms should be constructive and factual, since the inaccuracies in his letter does not augur well for him as a ‘so-called” journalist.
In closing, the Organisation would like to inform the public that they are free to examine the systems of operation at any of the RPA seed facilities in order to clear up any doubts they may have.
MR. LIONEL BHODRAM
RPA Field Extension Officer, Region 2

MR. RICKY ROOPCHAND
Project Officer-RPA

SHARE THIS ARTICLE :
Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
All our printed editions are available online
emblem3
Subscribe to the Guyana Chronicle.
Sign up to receive news and updates.
We respect your privacy.