BEFORE I delve into our discussion today I shall make a slight correction to an earlier statement I made. In a letter published by the Guyana Chronicle captioned, ‘We want justice for little Kimanie’. 

I might have unconsciously alluded to the theory that Cuba is a place where suspect training of medical personnel is carried out or a place where the training of its doctors are of poor quality, far from it. If I did, which certain salient points in that article seems to suggest,
I sincerely apologise to the government and people of that great country.
Cuba has been producing trained graduates in all facets of Guyanese society, honest and ambitious people who are making a worthwhile contribution to our country, and I applaud the Spanish speaking sister territory for this.
Cuba has done yeoman service for Guyana, therefore, I must temper my remarks but when you are dealing with bogus individuals masquerading under the facade of a doctor one has to pull out all the stops.

Let me highlight those areas of gross misrepresentations where this so called doctor is concerned. He is supposed to be a trained paediatrician who came back to Guyana sometime during the late 1980s to practice his nefarious science. His paediatric skills fall woefully short of being called a ‘trained doctor’ hence his qualifications and skill can be questioned by the number of infant mortalities that were occasioned at his hands. You talk to the personnel of some city hospitals who had the unfortunate experience of his service and you will get the morbid picture of this man.
As a paediatrician he has done a horrific job. Realising how dismal his record is he has now resigned himself to become an ‘expert witness’ in high profile cases where some form of a medical report is required in order for him to eke out a miserable existence. Like his compatriot Nigel Hughes, he is a paid piper who can sing any tune once the price is right.
In this regard, he readily avails himself to represent cases involving criminals of the worst kind with these bogus reports. In one of these cases he came as an expert witness in ballistics, a medical doctor turned ballistics expert, thankfully in that case the presiding judge was keen enough to question the evidence thus making a fool out of him.
So, this ‘doctor’ is in his own rights a political emissary not a medical doctor, planted there to see to it that criminals go free.
I am of the firm opinion that this man should be given the treatment he deserves whenever and wherever he surfaces. He must be exposed for all his evil deeds and his reports treated with the contempt it deserves.
NEIL ADAMS