Shooting the messenger

Dear editor,

IN a very corrupt society and one in which the will of the people has been side-lined as politicians pursue narrow interests, whistleblowing is an important avenue through which corruption can be uncovered. As one considers the mountain of evidence of mismanagement, fraud and corruption highlighted in the reports of the forensic audits that were commissioned by the coalition government when it took office, one is awed at how so much went unchecked and unexposed for so long across so many organs of the state. Unless whistleblower legislation is ratified and supported by a will to implement, whistleblowing will remain costly to whistleblowers.
Whistleblower legislation will be corrosive to the stomach of a sitting government in a corrupt society and it is not altogether surprising that the coalition government appears to have lost its appetite for implementation, though it had drafted an act and held consultations after taking office. We have not yet realised enactment of such a law and when this is compared to some others that have been pushed through within the government’s first two years in office, it is easy to deduce the order of priorities.

Without whistleblower legislation, retaliation by the politically connected and the powerful can mean dire consequences for those who attempt to expose wrongdoing. Such retaliation can range from public labelling and ridiculing to loss of employment, other employment hardships and even worse. Consequences may also extend beyond the person directly drawing awareness, to family, friends and loved ones. Awareness of the potential for such retaliation can instill fear and serve as a warning to those who might contemplate exposing corruption. When this prevails, the cost is borne by the country as it continues to support parasites.
We have witnessed such retaliation by government before to whistleblowers and to those who stand against corruption. In fact, TIGI highlighted the realities of an absence of whistleblower legislation in its November 13, 2012 column (Stabroek News) and called for enactment of protection. Almost five years later, this Shoot the Messenger concept is still applicable, given that the circumstances are set for bludgeoning Ms. Sherilyn Marks into oblivion or worse, for exposing the abuse of power by APNU Councillor, Ms. Carol Joseph.
In this case, Ms. Marks who was a nurse at the Fort Wellington Hospital, revealed that Ms. Joseph, while a sitting APNU Councillor in the local government council of Region Five, abused her power to leverage prescription painkiller injections. This revelation by the nurse was made following two complaints to her superiors in Region Five and to the Minister of Public Health. Ms. Marks was in a position where she considered herself exposed to eventually being held accountable for administering the prescription narcotic, Pethidine, more frequently and in a larger amount than usual to Ms. Joseph, but her cries for help went unanswered by her superiors at the level of the region and by the Minister of Public Health.
The failure of the Minister of Public Health and the officials in the region to act, was perhaps exacerbated and encouraged by the absence of a functional Integrity Commission to which Ms. Marks could have complained. We now know that in the circumstances, she was either going to be beaten into submission or face retaliation for resisting –- exactly the choices available when whistleblower protection is absent in a corrupt society. TIGI therefore salutes Ms. Marks for taking a stand. Exposing the situation was the correct thing to do, given that the system and the individuals in authority had failed her.
If all that the ministry had done was ignore Ms. Marks, this would be better than that which has occurred and that which has been set in motion. Instead, it retaliated. The first bit of retaliation was the transferring of Ms. Marks to another facility without her having requested it. Ms. Marks’s move to address the matter publicly after two attempts to urge the responsible officers to act appears to have embarrassed people of power who condoned Ms. Joseph’s actions. The transfer was a pathetic response, but one that sounded the alarm that whistleblowing will still not be tolerated. The transfer was done without consideration of any hardships or other changes in Ms. Marks’s circumstances that would result. This is inferred from the fact that she was not consulted on her transfer. She was therefore treated like an expendable pawn for going public.
The response is now being taken further to the stage of attempting to institute charges against Ms. Marks for breach of confidentiality. A disproportionate and public response has a long history of setting the stage for control and the message to be gleaned is that vicious retaliation by those with connections and power towards those who dare to expose wrongdoing is alive and well in Guyana. We do not support breaking the law and it is not yet known whether Ms. Marks broke any laws or codes of conduct. However, when those who have abused their power and those who have ignored their responsibility as public officials do so with impunity, while those who dare to expose wrongdoings are made to feel the consequence, it is mere lip service to the idea for those in authority to proclaim support for whistleblowers.
TIGI adds its voice to the few who have condemned the obviously retaliatory action against Ms Marks and implores others — both within and external to her ministry — particularly those who proclaim their support of workers’ rights, to rise to her defence. Condoning retaliation against whistleblowers is a backward step in the fight against corruption.
Yours sincerely,

Transparency Institute Guyana Inc. (TIGI)

SHARE THIS ARTICLE :
Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
All our printed editions are available online
emblem3
Subscribe to the Guyana Chronicle.
Sign up to receive news and updates.
We respect your privacy.