Journalists play a significant role in the struggle for and defense of democracy. This is true all across the world, and in many ways, Guyana is no different. That said, journalists, and more broadly the press, must follow the basic protocols of responsible journalism. In this regard, Guyana is sadly lacking. We have a far way to go, but one must not give up hope. Good journalism is based on a number of key principles and practices. Among the most important are – (a) sound investigation and research; (b) a dogged insistence on accuracy; (c) meticulous editing; (d) fairness and balance in coverage; and (e) the courage to stay open minded.

Some sections of the press in Guyana violate all of the above principles and practices, to the point where one must wonder if the sole purpose for existence is to criticise the PPP and specifically President Jagdeo. In fact, according to PPP General Secretary, Donald Ramotar, “there seems to be a campaign by some journalists and columnists, to soil the name of this country only to make political gains.”

In an interview with this writer, President Jagdeo expressed disappointment that “press freedom has not resulted in a greater sense of professionalism in the Guyanese media”.

One pattern that is now clear is the coordinated action among elements in the press and anti-government politicians and activists. One recent instance of this was the way in which the press reported the irresponsible statements of Mr. Corbin as ‘hard news. Mr. Corbin made some far-reaching statements on Liberia in order to satisfy supporters within his party. Most careful newspapers would have asked Mr. Corbin to clarify his remarks. Instead of doing so, Mr. Corbin’s words were reported as ‘breaking news.”

Much the same happened immediately after the fire that destroyed the Ministry of Health. A catastrophic and sensitive event such as that should have pushed the journalists and columnists to the point of extreme care. Instead, many started to circulate stories about an investigation at the Ministry and, pretty quickly, that became the story. The editors also failed to keep the letter writers to some basic standards.

As it stands today, anyone can write anything. The only qualification seems to be that it must be against the current administration. Editors really need to insist on higher standards of professionalism from their writers and columnists.